|
Unpredictable and inexplicable
Indiana's run exemplifies the tournament's charm
Posted: Monday April 01, 2002 11:20 AM
Updated: Wednesday April 03, 2002 5:31 PM
How can so many smart people be so wrong so often? That was my thought as I
walked off the Georgia Dome floor Saturday night following Indiana's 73-64 win
over Oklahoma. The Hoosiers were supposed to be too slow, too thin and too
starry-eyed to pull off the upset. Well, someone forgot to tell Indiana those
things, and now all sports fans -- not just hoopheads like us -- can be grateful
for the compelling drama that will unfurl in the final game of yet another
glorious NCAA
tournament.
I'm hoping that all the fuddy-duddies (including a few of my colleagues at this
very Web site) who wanted to re-seed these teams before the Final Four are now
re-seeing the light. Indiana playing for the championship game is a far more
enticing storyline than Maryland and Kansas duking it out. Let us all please
remember: The unique charm in the NCAA tournament lies in its longshot
possibilities. There are no second chances, no Game 2s. And no matter how
lopsided a matchup looks on paper, things still get decided on the court, not in
some computer. (See football, college.) Best of all, the three-week buildup
allows folks with a passing interest in the game to grow familiar with the
characters who act out the final drama. Most of America didn't know squat about
these Indiana Hoosiers two weeks ago, but now water coolers everywhere are
buzzing with chatter of Jared Jeffries' grace, Dane Fife's grit,
Tom Coverdale's ankle and Mike Davis'
humility.
Still, as much as I admire what Indiana has done, you won't find me jumping on
its bandwagon at this late stage. I still believe Maryland will win the
championship, but only a fool would try to argue that it will be a cakewalk.
This title will most definitely have to be
earned.
I can tell you this, though, I'm through underestimating Fife's defensive
quickness after watching him harass Hollis Price into a nightmarish
1-for-11 shooting night on Saturday. In Maryland guard Juan Dixon, Fife
will be defending a player similar to Price, both in physique and style.
Somehow, though, I'm guessing Dixon will do a better job handling Fife's
aggressiveness, if only because Dixon is surrounded by better players than Price
was. As smart as Price is, Dixon may be the smartest player I've ever seen, and
it says here he'll bait Fife into early foul trouble.
It would be easy to dismiss Jeffrey Newton's season-high 19 points as a
fluke, but at this stage of the tournament there is no such thing. Newton's
production resulted from the Sooners' efforts to lock down Jeffries, who scored
just eight points, but was still the most dominant player on the floor. If the
Terps neglect Newton in a similar fashion, he'll score some more. Once again,
however, there's a difference. Maryland's quartet of bigs is better than
Oklahoma's frontcourt players, and if those guys can outplay Kansas' front line,
even with Lonny Baxter in foul trouble, they should be able to handle
Indiana's trio of Jeffries, Newton and Jarrad Odle. I expect Maryland
coach Gary Williams will make it a point to get the ball in Baxter's
hands early and often to get him into the flow of the
game.
Finally, there's the all-important point guard position. Three weeks ago, when I
picked Maryland to win the tournament, I cited Steve Blake as the main
reason. Blake, however, has had a miserable few weeks, save for the late
3-pointer he buried to stave off UConn in the regional final. That Maryland
could beat Kansas so convincingly with Blake in a funk and Baxter in foul
trouble speaks to the Terps' incredible resiliency. Call it a hunch, but I think
Blake is due for a big game going against a courageous but still-hobbling
Coverdale.
As much as I enjoy covering the NCAA tournament, I'm always a little bummed when
championship Monday rolls around, because it means another season is coming to
an end. It will be particularly hard to say goodbye to these Indiana Hoosiers,
who have reminded us once again that a team can defy the predictions as long as
its players believe in themselves and each other. Maryland may end up winning
the game, but Mike Davis and his players won't need a scoreboard Monday night to
tell them whether they are winners. In my view, they've already
won.
Sports Illustrated staff writer Seth Davis covers college basketball for the
magazine and is a regular contributor to CNNSI.com.
|